A “Chilling New Portrait” of Child Predators? Or a Craven Old Way to Scare Us Sh*tless

Trying not to scream about this article in the Toronto Star, “Child Abduction and Murder Paint a Chilling New Portrait.” As reader Frankie wrote:

Just the WORST kind of scaremongering!!  They use these huge scary numbers but the bottom line is that in all of Canada, coast to coast, there have been an average of THREE kidnappings a year over the past 50 years.  THREE.  Seems they had to go back 50 years to get enough data to even do a statistical analysis.  More pedestrians were killed just in Toronto last month alone.  This piece makes me so angry!

While you’re reading the piece, keep asking yourself: Who benefits from a study like this? Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

2 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Here’s a brilliant idea; stop focusing on the aftermath of something unfavorable and start figuring out how to prevent people from doing the unacceptable activity years before they are close to doing it. Trace backwards until the victim is not yet at risk of becoming a victim and the perpetrator is not yet at risk of becoming a perpetrator and then work towards preventing either group from traveling down their respective disastrous paths.

People no longer are allowed to be disgusted, horrified, appalled, shocked, or angry each time some new instance of something very few people agree with occurs. The time for complaining expired decades or perhaps a century or longer ago. Societies can either shut up and do something or shut up and not do anything other than blame themselves for not having the drive to do anything else.

I know and traveled to Canada many times including Toronto

Two things: The Toronto Star is a conservative alternative to the larger Toronto Globe & Mail. Anything that comes from the Star has to be taken with a grain of salt.

Second, folks need to realize the context before posting articles from more enlightened places like Canada or Europe. Yes, the viewpoints expressed by some people in those articles can be outrageous but remember, Canada and other industrialized countries don’t have draconian incarceration and lifetime registration laws like the US. Therefore, article message usually gets ignored in public opinion. And the results of some lame study normally doesn’t get translated into a country’s public policy & criminal justice approach

However, these kinds of articles are ripe for uninformed American consumers, victims advocates, and politicians. Therein lies the danger